Lodgecrest wrote:I also felt that Getis view were informative and helpful to those that may require a refund.
I agree that Getsis had valid point and the information should be available, but it was more than likely the personal attacks that got the posts removed not the information. I agree with what karen did, instead of trying to censor out something in a post and opening up a "why didn't you censor xxxyyy's post" arguments, just wipe it and start over.
Getsis, feel free to post and even repost any of the valid issues you brought up, just keep it civil.
I agree it's always possible to go after someone/company even with a disclaimer. Happens all the time. I want to sue the city because Johnny drowned even though there is a big "Swim at your on Risk" "We are not responsible" sign that he had to crawl over to get in the pool. On the other hand... I'm not a lawyer and I really don't know anything about UK laws, but I think sending in payment would be the equivilent of a verbal contract, so even though a document was not signed it's still probably the same as an electroninc agreement. I don't know where you would go with that, just my thoughts.
For the record, I'm not concerned about it, ask me that again if 12 months go by and we are still in the same position, and I'm sure I'll have a different attitude